<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PRPOV &#187; POV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prpov.com/category/pov/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prpov.com</link>
	<description>PR and Stuff...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 02:55:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>China vs. Google = a dubious mobile experience for Chinese consumers</title>
		<link>http://www.prpov.com/2010/03/26/china_google_mobile_phones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prpov.com/2010/03/26/china_google_mobile_phones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[POV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linkedin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mww group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prpov.com/?p=216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was quoted in a PRWeek story by Aarti Shah today (&#8220;Google&#8217;s China move affirms reputation&#8220;). The article focusses on the Google brand and how its decision to &#8220;not censor&#8221; search and move their operations to a Hong Kong server might impact their brand reputation. I think the simple answer is: only in good ways. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was quoted in a <em>PRWeek</em> story by Aarti Shah today (&#8220;<a title="Google's China move affirms reputation" href="http://www.prweekus.com/googles-china-move-affirms-reputation/article/166635/" target="_blank">Google&#8217;s China move affirms reputation</a>&#8220;). The article focusses on the Google brand and how its decision to &#8220;not censor&#8221; search and move their operations to a Hong Kong server might impact their brand reputation.</p>
<p>I think the simple answer is: only in good ways. Why? Because they stayed true to their <a href="http://www.google.com/corporate/tenthings.html" target="_blank">Philosophy</a> and chose to not compromise. Regardless of how you might view Google&#8217;s business overall (selling advertising and collecting data about people), you won&#8217;t be able to corner them for being hypocrites!</p>
<p>But this does bring up an interesting point not being debated as much right now:  Why go into China in the first place? Did they really think this wasn&#8217;t going to be an issue?  Google is a smart company, with some of the smartest people in the world.  Naïve isn’t  a word I would use to describe them. But let me table that for another day (and another blog)!</p>
<p>What I think is most interesting is how this act will impact mobile-focused companies doing business in China that rely on Google to help monazite their products and services.  For example,  OEMs like Motorola are breaking ties with Google in China. This is most likely a pragmatic act of  solidarity with the Chinese Government as Google might not be available in China in the near future anyway&#8230;so why not hedge their bets?<br />
<div id="attachment_218" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 228px"><a href="http://www.prpov.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/android3.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-218 " title="android3" src="http://www.prpov.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/android3-273x300.jpg" alt="Google Android Mad!" width="218" height="240" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Google Android devices will suffer in China without Google services</p></div><br />
But to understand fully the implications here, you have to remember that Google isn’t just a web search being used on LAPTOPs and PCS. Google today is about mobile phones, mobile search, and location based services.  When looking at the global usage numbers these are consistently the big drivers in mobile data traffic. This is why people PAY for data plans.</p>
<div>
<br />But now, Motorola is going to remove Google search from the Android devices that they are marketing and selling to Chinese consumers. That&#8217;s like trying to sell a three-legged horse. Which is to say: useless!</div>
<div>
<br />
As I mention in the PRWeek story, moving its servers to Hong Kong was a hell of chess move by Google. But the fall out from this decision &#8212; including the subsequent business decisions made by OEM&#8217;s like Motorola and any actions the Chinese Government might take &#8212;  could be a huge blow to mobile consumers in China.</div>
<div class="shr-publisher-216"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prpov.com/2010/03/26/china_google_mobile_phones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What if AT&amp;T sold HDTVs?</title>
		<link>http://www.prpov.com/2009/10/25/what-if-att-sold-hdtvs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prpov.com/2009/10/25/what-if-att-sold-hdtvs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[POV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iptv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linkedin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phillips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[triple play]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prpov.com/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was just reading a story by Chris Foresman at Ars Technica about the future of AT&#38;T sans iPhone exclusivity. There is no doubt that AT&#38;T gambled (a lot) and won (a lot) with their bet on the iPhone. So let&#8217;s call it a success and move on. What I think is a more interesting question [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was just reading a story by <a href="http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2009/10/as-exclusivity-fades-att-success-still-linked-iphone.ars" target="_blank">Chris Foresman</a> at Ars Technica about the future of AT&amp;T sans iPhone exclusivity.</p>
<p>There is no doubt that AT&amp;T gambled (a lot) and won (a lot) with their bet on the iPhone. So let&#8217;s call it a success and move on.</p>
<p>What I think is a more interesting question to ponder: when will AT&amp;T better leverages its quad-play (home phone, cell, Internet and IPTV) offerings to begin really owning the digital home. I am not talking about discounted package deals and single billing statements. Yawn.  What I am talking about is going into an AT&amp;T store seeing a big, beautiful HDTV and getting it for free or near free (say $20 per month) for signing a 2 year commitment for new IPTV and Internet service.</p>
<p>When this happens, AT&amp;T would not only drive up subscribers, but drive HDTV sales and services through the roof. I love going into Best Buy, but if AT&amp;T was willing to off set the cost of a new HDTV like they do for cell phones, I&#8217;d be the first in line.</p>
<p>If you are a tech-nerd like me, take a step back before you blast me on the disadvantages of bundling. I know the customer service issues needed to be dealt with first! But most people don&#8217;t want to be CIOs of their house. They want a simple solution to bring everything together. And think &#8212; what&#8217;s the next logical step once all these things are connected together? Access to advanced content and services. Not just movies, but critically needed services such as remote home network management, off-site file back-ups (documents, movies, photos and videos), managed DRM so you can move content from one device to another (legally), and much much more.</p>
<p>I am not the first to prognosticate about the future of telco and cable companies (sorry satellite), so believe this isn&#8217;t a matter of if this will happen, but when. And when it does&#8230; that will be a hell of thing to be able to promote. Much more interesting than bundled billing!</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-41"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prpov.com/2009/10/25/what-if-att-sold-hdtvs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

